[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

(usagi-users 00027) Re: glibc-2.2 released

To: petrescu@xxxxxxx
Subject: (usagi-users 00027) Re: glibc-2.2 released
From: Hideaki YOSHIFUJI (吉藤英明) <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2000 01:27:45 +0900
Cc: usagi-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <m3snp0i2tl.fsf@localhost.localdomain>
References: <20001110140529S.yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> <m3snp0i2tl.fsf@localhost.localdomain>
Reply-to: usagi-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: "Hideaki YOSHIFUJI" <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

In article <m3snp0i2tl.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> (at 10 Nov 2000 10:39:02 +0100), "Alexandru Petrescu" <petrescu@xxxxxxx> says:

> > BTW, original glibc-2.2 do not support ipv6 of linux-2.2.x kernel,
> 
> So I understand glibc-2.2 does support ipv6 of the linux-2.4-0-testx ?

Yes, but buggy.

We may prepare some patch that fixes its bugs without advanced features, 
IMHO.


> > What do you think of removing this hack from our USAGI version of 
> > glibc-2.2?
> 
> You mean getting rid of the whole glibc-usagi patch, or only the
> kernel 2.2 support ?  Whatever, I think you should keep it there and
:

I mean getting rid of hack for linux-2.2 compatibility 
in our glibc trees; glibc-2.1 and glibc-2.2.  

-- 
Hideaki YOSHIFUJI @ USAGI Project  <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
PGP5i FP: F731 6599 5EB2 BBA7 1515  1323 1806 A96F 5700 6B25

Follow-Ups:
- (usagi-users 00029) Re: glibc-2.2 released
  - From: Yuji Sekiya

References:
- (usagi-users 00024) glibc-2.2 released
  - From: 吉藤英明
- (usagi-users 00025) Re: glibc-2.2 released
  - From: Alexandru Petrescu

Prev by Date: (usagi-users 00026) using glibc-usagi simply and safely
Next by Date: (usagi-users 00028) Re: using glibc-usagi simply and safely
Previous by thread: (usagi-users 00025) Re: glibc-2.2 released
Next by thread: (usagi-users 00029) Re: glibc-2.2 released
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread