[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
(usagi-users 00033) Re: Why is struct ipv6hdr still old-style RFC1883 ?
- To: laforge@xxxxxxxxxxxx, laforge@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: (usagi-users 00033) Re: Why is struct ipv6hdr still old-style RFC1883 ?
- From: Hideaki YOSHIFUJI (吉藤英明) <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2000 21:14:52 +0900
- Cc: netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, usagi-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <20001112230116.A3817@obroa-skai.gnumonks.org>
- References: <20001112230116.A3817@obroa-skai.gnumonks.org>
- Reply-to: usagi-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Sender: "Hideaki YOSHIFUJI" <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In article <20001112230116.A3817@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> (at Sun, 12 Nov 2000 23:01:17 +0100), Harald Welte <laforge@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> says:
> Why is struct ipv6hdr still implementing the old RFC1883 style
> 4-bit prio and 24-bit flowlabel fields instead of the RFC2460
> 8-bit tc and 20-bit flowlabel fields?
>
> Is this just some legacy which nobody got around to change? If this is
> the case, I'm going to update this. Are there any other reasons?
Do you mind if we, USAGI Project, decided to use new structures
defined in RFC2292 / RFC2292bis?
--
Hideaki YOSHIFUJI @ USAGI Project <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
PGP5i FP: F731 6599 5EB2 BBA7 1515 1323 1806 A96F 5700 6B25