[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
(usagi-users 00040) Re: router solicitation
- To: Arkadiusz Miskiewicz <misiek@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: (usagi-users 00040) Re: router solicitation
- From: Yuji Sekiya <sekiya@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2000 15:03:23 +0900
- Cc: usagi-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: In your message of "Thu, 23 Nov 2000 18:20:22 +0100" <20001123182022.A12194@pld.ORG.PL>
- Organization: Keio University
- References: <20001123182022.A12194@pld.ORG.PL>
- Reply-to: usagi-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- User-agent: Wanderlust/1.1.1 (Purple Rain) EMIKO/1.13.12 (Euglena sociabilis) CLIME/1.13.6 (中ノ庄) APEL/10.2 MULE XEmacs/21.1 (patch 9) (Canyonlands) (i686-pc-linux)
At Thu, 23 Nov 2000 18:20:22 +0100,
Arkadiusz Miskiewicz <misiek@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hello,
> so it shouldn't send any RS etc but it still does:
> Nov 23 19:07:39 arm kernel: send_rs: send RS message
> Nov 23 19:07:43 arm kernel: eth0: no IPv6 routers present
Do you configure autoconf/router_solicitations = 0 before
interface up ? If you configure them after interface up,
you should do it before. If not, we will investigate it.
> but just moment after "kernel: eth0: no IPv6 routers present"
> bogus route (default to eth0) is added by kernel:
Even if you configure autoconf/router_solicitation = 0 after
interface up, installing bugous route is wrong. we will investigate
and improve it.
Thanks for your report.
-- Yuji Sekiya