(usagi-users 00261) Re: recent snap patches missing

[Yuji Sekiya <sekiya@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

At Mon, 5 Mar 2001 09:21:37 +0100,
Arkadiusz Miskiewicz <misiek@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> > I can understand your point. 
> heh ;) usually we put source url to patches/sources etc. But this isn't so important.
> Integrating into main glibc is for me most important because I don't like
> to create incompatibilities between our (pld) glibc and other distribution vendors glibcs.

Yes we think it is important to integrate our patches into main glibc.

> > we decided to change the style of packaging and make USAGI libinet6
> > library.
> Instead of removing patches you should start writting FAQ od some other
> documentation IMO.

We begin to make FAQ on our web site and write some documentation into
doc directory in the tarball. But we think indeed we need more
documentations :-(
	http://www.linux-ipv6.org/faq.html

> > Of course we integrate our improvements in USAGI libinet6
> > into glibc at each STABLE release.
> I didn't see integration of February 5, 2001: 20010205-STABLE into official glibc cvs...
> Maybe Drepper didn't applied patch if it was sent but I didn't see it on libc-alpha@ neither.

Sorry for my confusion, we provide a patch against original glibc at
each STABLE release from our libinet6.

Of course we want to integrate our patches into main kernel/glibc
trunk step by step.

-- Yuji Sekiya @ USAGI Project