(usagi-users 00288) Re: USAGI IPv6 patches

[itojun@xxxxxxxxxx]

>IMHO, we should enable ipv4-mapped address support by default 
>for RFC compliance.  And bind(2) with both of ipv4 and ipv6 
>should be accepted if IPV6_V6ONLY has been set to ipv6 socket
>for compatibility with application already, wildly being used
>on Linux Systems.

	if I were you I'd propose to drop RFC conformance and disable IPv4
	mapped address by default, and have IPV6_V6ONLY socket option for
	re-enabling it (= kame/netbsd behavior).  when default bevhavior is
	on insecure side I get worried.

	another issue is bind(2) ordering and conflict table... :-P

>I'd like to talk about this issue with itojun, jinmei and others.
>In IETF?

	of course.  i heard that you will have a linux-usagi unofficial
	meeting at th venue, i'll try to show up there.

itojun