[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

(usagi-users 00297) Re: USAGI IPv6 patches

To: kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: (usagi-users 00297) Re: USAGI IPv6 patches
From: horape@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2001 17:06:00 -0300
Cc: davem@xxxxxxxxxx, bam@xxxxxxxxxx, pekkas@xxxxxxxxxx, debian-ipv6@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, usagi-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <200103161950.WAA16640@ms2.inr.ac.ru>; from kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru on Fri, Mar 16, 2001 at 10:50:12PM +0300
References: <20010316164611.A17490@tinuviel.compendium.net.ar> <200103161950.WAA16640@ms2.inr.ac.ru>
Reply-to: usagi-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.3.15i

¡Hola!

> > USAGI has the check 
> I know and was puzzled why it disappeared.

> > ifdef
> No ifdefs. This check cannot be optional.

Yes, i'll do it without IFDEF (as i did with the DOUBLE_BIND that is
ifdef'ed in USAGI too)

> Please, answer the first question... I still do not understand this issue.

USAGI people is better to answer it to you, i'm researching it a bit before
answering. Have me a little patience please.

> Alexey

					HoraPe
---
Horacio J. Peña
horape@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
horape@xxxxxxxxxx
bofh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
horape@xxxxxxxxxxx

References:
- (usagi-users 00295) Re: USAGI IPv6 patches
  - From: horape
- (usagi-users 00296) Re: USAGI IPv6 patches
  - From: kuznet

Prev by Date: (usagi-users 00296) Re: USAGI IPv6 patches
Next by Date: (usagi-users 00298) Re: USAGI IPv6 patches
Previous by thread: (usagi-users 00296) Re: USAGI IPv6 patches
Next by thread: (usagi-users 00299) Re: USAGI IPv6 patches
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread