[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

(usagi-users 00487) Re: NFS for IPv6 ?

To: usagi-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Stig.Venaas@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: (usagi-users 00487) Re: NFS for IPv6 ?
From: shun@xxxxxxxxx
Date: Mon, 07 May 2001 07:17:31 +0900 (LMT)
Cc: jrh@xxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20010505215140.C12682@sverresborg.uninett.no>
References: <3AE7EAC9.37C916A4@it.uc3m.es> <20010502.215405.60854433.shun@ipsmg.org> <20010505215140.C12682@sverresborg.uninett.no>
Reply-to: usagi-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Stig and all.

From: Stig Venaas <Stig.Venaas@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: (usagi-users 00482) Re: NFS for IPv6 ?
Date: Sat, 5 May 2001 21:51:40 +0200

> > But, the current USAGI snapshot doesn't adopt it.
> > Because it dosen't support TI-RPC. Its API is original.
> 
> Sorry, but could you tell me what TI-RPC is?

TI-RPC is an abbreviation of Transport Independent Remote Procedure Call.
This is the HomePage of TI-RPC.
http://www.as400.ibm.com/developer/tirpc/

NetBSD supports TI-RPC.
We think TI-RPC is the standard protocol of RPC over IPv6.

-------------------------------------------------
 Shunsuke Tanaka           IPSMG Project
 mail: shun@xxxxxxxxx      http://www.ipsmg.org/
-------------------------------------------------

References:
- (usagi-users 00428) NFS for IPv6 ?
  - From: Juan Fco Rodriguez Hervella
- (usagi-users 00466) Re: NFS for IPv6 ?
  - From: shun
- (usagi-users 00482) Re: NFS for IPv6 ?
  - From: Stig Venaas

Prev by Date: (usagi-users 00486) Re: Major Header breakage for 2.4.4 snap patches
Next by Date: (usagi-users 00488) Routing question
Previous by thread: (usagi-users 00482) Re: NFS for IPv6 ?
Next by thread: (usagi-users 00432) CMSG_SPACE() == inet6_option_space() (RFC 2292) ?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread