[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
(usagi-users 00529) Re: Autoconfiguration problem with radvd
- To: usagi-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: (usagi-users 00529) Re: Autoconfiguration problem with radvd
- From: Juan Francisco Rodriguez Hervella <jrh@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 19 May 2001 11:00:46 +0200 (MET DST)
- Cc: mipl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <OF5003E15E.CBE61187-ON88256A50.007DF87B@LocalDomain>
- Reply-to: usagi-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
A router must not be configured using RTADV, the router advertisements
are only for hosts. You must add the prefix manually and if your
topology is complicated you can use a RIPNG or BGP+4 daemon for the
routes.
See the mailing list, I remember some discusion about this topic.
On Fri, 18 May 2001, Venkata Jagana wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> We have noticed a problem with autoconfiguration at the router, and have
> found a potential workaround. We would like to know if this is really a
> problem or a configuration setup issue, and whether others have experienced
> this similar problem.
>
> We have configured a 2.4.2 linux box as a router with 2 network interfaces,
> and two nodes connected to the two interfaces. We are using radvd to
> configure
> global subnet prefixes on both the interfaces as well as the 2 nodes
> connected on this network.
>
> When the router boots, if we enable forwarding
> (net.ipv6.conf.all.forwarding)
> and then start radvd, the two local interfaces on the router don't get
> global
> addresses and also there are no corresponding route entries. However the 2
> nodes on the network get global addresses (with global prefixes set in
> radvd.conf) from the radvd's router advertisement as expected. Due to this,
> we are not able to even ping6 one node from the other since the routing
> entries on the router are not setup at all.
>
> We have found a workaround for this problem by first running radvd and then
> enabling ipv6 forwarding. Without changing the kernel or any other
> configuration, the local interfaces are initialized with global addresses,
> and the routing tables are also setup correctly and then we are able to
> ping6 across the router.
>
> Has anyone else seen this problem, is this an error in our configuration or
> a genuine problem ?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Krishna Kumar & Venkat Jagana
> IBM IPv6 Team
>
>