[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

(usagi-users 00577) Re: 2.4.4/2.4.5 kernel snaps?

To: sekiya@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: (usagi-users 00577) Re: 2.4.4/2.4.5 kernel snaps?
From: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2001 01:00:59 +0900
Cc: usagi-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <m3k82jkobw.wl@shaku.sfc.wide.ad.jp>
List-subscribe: <mailto:usagi-users-ctl@linux-ipv6.org?body=subscribe>
References: <m3lmmzkphs.wl@shaku.sfc.wide.ad.jp> <20010612004628M.yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> <m3k82jkobw.wl@shaku.sfc.wide.ad.jp>
Reply-to: usagi-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: "Hideaki YOSHIFUJI" <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

In article <m3k82jkobw.wl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> (at Tue, 12 Jun 2001 00:50:43 +0900), Yuji Sekiya <sekiya@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> says:

> > "cvs co -r LINUS" (or so) can help us...
> 
> Yes, I know. However in order to make clean patches
> against original kernel, I adopt the method  to make
> diffs between original kernel and USAGI kernel.
> 
> It is based on my experiments.

hmm, vendor branch SHOULD be equal to the original kernel.
if it is not the case, please let ME know...

--yoshfuji

Follow-Ups:
- (usagi-users 00578) Re: 2.4.4/2.4.5 kernel snaps?
  - From: Yuji Sekiya

References:
- (usagi-users 00574) Re: 2.4.4/2.4.5 kernel snaps?
  - From: Yuji Sekiya
- (usagi-users 00575) Re: 2.4.4/2.4.5 kernel snaps?
  - From: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明
- (usagi-users 00576) Re: 2.4.4/2.4.5 kernel snaps?
  - From: Yuji Sekiya

Prev by Date: (usagi-users 00576) Re: 2.4.4/2.4.5 kernel snaps?
Next by Date: (usagi-users 00578) Re: 2.4.4/2.4.5 kernel snaps?
Previous by thread: (usagi-users 00576) Re: 2.4.4/2.4.5 kernel snaps?
Next by thread: (usagi-users 00578) Re: 2.4.4/2.4.5 kernel snaps?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread