[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
(usagi-users 00685) Re: Looking for an implementation of DHCPv6
- To: usagi-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: (usagi-users 00685) Re: Looking for an implementation of DHCPv6
- From: Ralph Droms <rdroms@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2001 14:14:58 -0400
- In-reply-to: <Pine.SOL.4.20.0108161011111.6793-100000@penelope.ecs.soton .ac.uk>
- References: <4.3.2.7.2.20010815234427.03b28f78@funnel.cisco.com>
- Reply-to: usagi-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
There were several issues that were bundled into the single action item of redesigning and rewriting the IA option spec...
- Ralph
At 10:12 AM 8/16/2001 +0100, Tim Chown wrote:
>On Wed, 15 Aug 2001, Ralph Droms wrote:
>
>> At the most recent meeting of the DHC WG (IETF-51 in London), we resolved all but one of the remaining issues in the DHCPv6 spec. A design team expects to have a resolution for that one outstanding issue in two weeks. I am working to complete the next rev of the DHCPv6 spec by the end of August. This next draft should be ready for final review by the IESG.
>>
>> - Ralph Droms
>> Chair, DHC working group
>> Editor, DHCPv6 spec
>
>I seem to recall a number of issues being handed off at the meeting for one
>or more people to come back on - are these all considered "resolved"?
>
>There seemed to be some additional creeping featurism at the meeting?
>
>Clearly any move to get the spec to review by Sepetember would be great :-)
>
>Tim