[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
(usagi-users 00690) Re: Updating address lifetime (again)
- To: <usagi-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: (usagi-users 00690) Re: Updating address lifetime (again)
- From: Pekka Savola <pekkas@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2001 10:47:32 +0300 (EEST)
- Cc: <alakoski@xxxxxxxxx>
- In-reply-to: <20010820161757U.yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>
- Reply-to: usagi-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Mon, 20 Aug 2001, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / [iso-2022-jp] 吉藤英明 wrote:
> In article <Pine.SOL.4.30.0108171127070.1557-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> (at Mon, 20 Aug 2001 08:34:50 +0300 (EET DST)), Alakoski Teemu <alakoski@xxxxxxxxx> says:
>
> > If I specify a valid lifetime of 7300 seconds or more on router, address
> > lifetimes on hosts is updated nicely every time new RA arrives.
>
> > What can cause this?
> > Any ideas?
>
> How about the preferred lifetime in your RAs?
> If it were greater than valid lifetime, kernel would have ignored the RAs.
Entirely possible, but e.g. radvd configuration sanity checks prevent
this, so I'm a bit doubtful.
--
Pekka Savola "Tell me of difficulties surmounted,
Netcore Oy not those you stumble over and fall"
Systems. Networks. Security. -- Robert Jordan: A Crown of Swords