[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

(usagi-users 00691) Re: Updating address lifetime (again)

To: usagi-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: (usagi-users 00691) Re: Updating address lifetime (again)
From: itojun@xxxxxxxxxx
Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2001 16:53:57 +0900
In-reply-to: pekkas's message of Mon, 20 Aug 2001 10:46:36 +0300. <Pine.LNX.4.33.0108200954140.4942-100000@netcore.fi>
List-subscribe: <mailto:usagi-users-ctl@linux-ipv6.org?body=subscribe>
Reply-to: usagi-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: itojun@xxxxxxxxxx

>This _might_ be a bug in "TWO_HOURS" rule, see
>addrconf.c:addrconf_prefix_rcv.  Also see RFC2462 5.5.3. e). (this has
>been updated slightly by so-called "Jim Bound rule" afterwards)

	"jim bound rule" is not an official one.  KAME has been using jim bound
	rule, however, is now using RFC2462.

itojun

References:
- (usagi-users 00689) Re: Updating address lifetime (again)
  - From: Pekka Savola

Prev by Date: (usagi-users 00690) Re: Updating address lifetime (again)
Next by Date: (usagi-users 00692) Re: Updating address lifetime (again)
Previous by thread: (usagi-users 00689) Re: Updating address lifetime (again)
Next by thread: (usagi-users 00693) Re: Updating address lifetime (again)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread