(usagi-users 00692) Re: Updating address lifetime (again)

[Alakoski Teemu <alakoski@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Mon, 20 Aug 2001, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / [iso-2022-jp] 吉藤英明 wrote:

> In article <Pine.SOL.4.30.0108171127070.1557-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> (at Mon, 20 Aug 2001 08:34:50 +0300 (EET DST)), Alakoski Teemu <alakoski@xxxxxxxxx> says:
>
> > If I specify a valid lifetime of 7300 seconds or more on router, address
> > lifetimes on hosts is updated nicely every time new RA arrives.
>
> How about the preferred lifetime in your RAs?
> If it were greater than valid lifetime, kernel would have ignored the RAs.

Preferred lifetime was 15 seconds all the time. (In my recent test, I've
also tested with other preferred lifetimes.) Only valid lifetime seems to
matter.

__________________________________
Teemu Alakoski, Research assistant

TAMPERE UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY
Telecommunications Laboratory,
Networks and Protocols Group

alakoski@xxxxxxxxx 050-5935486
__________________________________