[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

(usagi-users 00983) Re: ISATAP implementation...

To: templin@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: (usagi-users 00983) Re: ISATAP implementation...
From: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2001 20:04:06 +0900
Cc: usagi-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, lutchann@xxxxxxxxxx, sastry@xxxxxxxxxxx, jpm@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <3BD8AB57.D9D39C5E@erg.sri.com>
References: <200110240901.RAA00835@cwcsun41.cwc.nus.edu.sg> <3BD8AB57.D9D39C5E@erg.sri.com>
Reply-to: usagi-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: "Hideaki YOSHIFUJI" <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

In article <3BD8AB57.D9D39C5E@xxxxxxxxxxx> (at Thu, 25 Oct 2001 17:16:23 -0700), "Fred L. Templin" <templin@xxxxxxxxxxx> says:

> Attached to this message, please find diff's relative to the current
> USAGI CVS tree that implement the ISATAP functionality as extensions
> to the existing IPv6-in-IPv4 tunnel driver found in:
:
> At this time, I would like to request that the diff's be folded into the
> USAGI CVS repository. Can one of the core members please advise on how
> to proceed?

Applied with some modification.  thanks a lot!

--yoshfuji

Follow-Ups:
- (usagi-users 00999) Re: ISATAP implementation...
  - From: Fred L. Templin
- (usagi-users 00987) Re: ISATAP implementation...
  - From: Fred L. Templin

References:
- (usagi-users 00916) patches for implementing port selection in IPSEC6 SADB/SPD and pfkey
  - From: Parijat Mishra
- (usagi-users 00922) ISATAP implementation...
  - From: Fred L. Templin

Prev by Date: (usagi-users 00982) Re: Multiple processes binding to same port/address
Next by Date: (usagi-users 00984) Re: Multiple processes binding to same port/address
Previous by thread: (usagi-users 00923) Re: ISATAP implementation...
Next by thread: (usagi-users 00987) Re: ISATAP implementation...
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread