[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
(usagi-users 00985) Re: radvd & ICMPv6 checksum errors
- To: usagi-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, peralta@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: (usagi-users 00985) Re: radvd & ICMPv6 checksum errors
- From: Noriaki Takamiya <takamiya@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2001 21:35:21 +0900 (JST)
- Cc: takamiya@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <20011106122640.A21297@spisa.act.uji.es>
- References: <20011106122640.A21297@spisa.act.uji.es>
- Reply-to: usagi-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Hello,
>> Tue, 6 Nov 2001 12:26:40 +0100
>> [Subject: (usagi-users 00977) radvd & ICMPv6 checksum errors]
>> Luis Peralta <peralta@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote...
peralta> I'm not able to get USAGI stack to autoconfigure my IPv6 network. When
peralta> I start radvd I get this message:
peralta>
peralta> [Nov 06 10:52:03] radvd: our AdvCurHopLimit on eth0 doesn't agree with
peralta> fe80::2a0:ccff:fe53:cc08
Probably AdvCurHopLimit value of the Router Advertisement daemons on
eth0 network is not the same value.
In process.c, the following process is done.
--------------------------------------------------
189 if ((radvert->nd_ra_curhoplimit && iface->AdvCurHopLimit) &&
190 (radvert->nd_ra_curhoplimit != iface->AdvCurHopLimit))
191 {
192 log(LOG_WARNING, "our AdvCurHopLimit on %s doesn't agree
with %s",
193 iface->Name, addr_str);
194 }
--------------------------------------------------
Could you check AdvCurHopLimit value?
peralta> And when a node tries to get its address, I get this on client console:
peralta>
peralta> ICMPv6 checksum failed [fe80:0000:0000:0000:02a0:ccff:fe53:cc08 >
peralta> ff02:0000:0000:0000:0000:0000:0000:0001]
This message is not still shown in my environment.
Regards,
--
Noriaki Takamiya NTT Software.