[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
(usagi-users 00986) Re: Multiple processes binding to same port/address
- To: parijat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: (usagi-users 00986) Re: Multiple processes binding to same port/address
- From: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2001 22:45:56 +0900
- Cc: usagi-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <200111071115.TAA02281@cwcsun41.cwc.nus.edu.sg>
- References: <200111071115.TAA02281@cwcsun41.cwc.nus.edu.sg>
- Reply-to: usagi-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Sender: "Hideaki YOSHIFUJI" <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In article <200111071115.TAA02281@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> (at Wed, 7 Nov 2001 19:21:54 -0500), Parijat Mishra <parijat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> says:
> Perhaps I should add that it fails both with IPv4 and IPv6 (multicast)
> address.
:
> > > Do you set SO_REUSEADDR?
:
> > Yes, of course. And the setsockopt() call returns without failure. As I
> > said, the application works under the standard kernel. I might emphasize
> > again that the application is trying to bind to a multicast addresss.
> > Could that have anything to do with it?
Please tell us your (usagi) kernel revision and its configuration
such as CONFIG_NET_MODERATE_REUSE, CONFIG_IPV6_MODERATE_DOUBLE_BIND.
--yoshfuji