[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

(usagi-users 01006) Re: Scoped Addresses

To: Ben Clifford <benc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: (usagi-users 01006) Re: Scoped Addresses
From: Bernd Walter <ipv6@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2001 18:37:50 +0100
Cc: Juan Antonio <ja_rosa@xxxxxxxx>, "Users IPv6. org Mailing list" <users@xxxxxxxx>, USAGI Mailing List <usagi-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10111121609590.28923-100000@tree.custom-access.net>
References: <FDEKIDEEIOKNGGCOBOGOCEBOCAAA.ja_rosa@terra.es> <Pine.LNX.4.10.10111121609590.28923-100000@tree.custom-access.net>
Reply-to: usagi-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.3.23i

On Mon, Nov 12, 2001 at 04:11:13PM +0000, Ben Clifford wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Nov 2001, Juan Antonio wrote:
> 
> > 	Could any body explain me why is necessary to indicate the
> > interface only in Link Local Addresses?
> 
> Can anybody explain why you don't have scoping on site local addresses -
> if I configure eth0 and eth1 to have the same prefix, on the basis that
> they are different sites, how do I specify which to use?

Why would you want to do this?
The site local addressrange contain enough prefixes that theres no need
to reuse them within a single site.

-- 
B.Walter              COSMO-Project         http://www.cosmo-project.de
ticso@xxxxxxxxx         Usergroup           info@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Follow-Ups:
- (usagi-users 01007) Re: Scoped Addresses
  - From: Ben Clifford

References:
- (usagi-users 01002) Scoped Addresses
  - From: Juan Antonio
- (usagi-users 01005) Re: Scoped Addresses
  - From: Ben Clifford

Prev by Date: (usagi-users 01009) [usagi-announce] 2001/11/12 snapshot
Next by Date: (usagi-users 01007) Re: Scoped Addresses
Previous by thread: (usagi-users 01005) Re: Scoped Addresses
Next by thread: (usagi-users 01007) Re: Scoped Addresses
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread