[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

(usagi-users 01008) Re: Scoped Addresses

To: usagi-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, benc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: (usagi-users 01008) Re: Scoped Addresses
From: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2001 03:19:29 +0900
Cc: ja_rosa@xxxxxxxx, users@xxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10111121609590.28923-100000@tree.custom-access.net>
References: <FDEKIDEEIOKNGGCOBOGOCEBOCAAA.ja_rosa@terra.es> <Pine.LNX.4.10.10111121609590.28923-100000@tree.custom-access.net>
Reply-to: usagi-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: "Hideaki YOSHIFUJI" <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

In article <Pine.LNX.4.10.10111121609590.28923-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> (at Mon, 12 Nov 2001 16:11:13 +0000 (UCT)), Ben Clifford <benc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> says:

> Can anybody explain why you don't have scoping on site local addresses -
> if I configure eth0 and eth1 to have the same prefix, on the basis that
> they are different sites, how do I specify which to use?

It is one of our TODO thing; it will be based on the coming 
addressing architecture spec.

--yoshfuji

References:
- (usagi-users 01002) Scoped Addresses
  - From: Juan Antonio
- (usagi-users 01005) Re: Scoped Addresses
  - From: Ben Clifford

Prev by Date: (usagi-users 01007) Re: Scoped Addresses
Next by Date: (usagi-users 01010) Re: Scoped Addresses
Previous by thread: (usagi-users 01020) Re: Scoped Addresses
Next by thread: (usagi-users 01009) [usagi-announce] 2001/11/12 snapshot
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread