[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
(usagi-users 01020) Re: Scoped Addresses
- To: USAGI Mailing List <usagi-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: (usagi-users 01020) Re: Scoped Addresses
- From: Pekka Savola <pekkas@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2001 10:08:02 +0200 (EET)
- Cc: Ben Clifford <benc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Bernd Walter <ipv6@xxxxxxxxx>, "Users IPv6. org Mailing list" <users@xxxxxxxx>
- In-reply-to: <20011112222035.A30097@cicely8.cicely.de>
- Reply-to: usagi-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Mon, 12 Nov 2001, Bernd Walter wrote:
> > I am not suggesting routing packets from one site to another - I am just
> > saying that a particular machine may be connected to multiple sites
> > (without routing packets between those sites).
>
> Well site local addresses are defined to be fec0::/10.
> Lets say each site has enough with /48 and the leaving 38 bits are
> filled with a site specific random value.
> If you are ever in need to connect to another site you have a
> (2^38)-1 : 1 chance that you don't collide.
> If you don't do you shouldn't be surprised some day.
Wanna bet more than one organization is going to pick the random value
000....000 ? :-)
Systems connecting to more than one site-local domain may need two
separate routing tables (in worst case, for each interface), I'm afraid.
--
Pekka Savola "Tell me of difficulties surmounted,
Netcore Oy not those you stumble over and fall"
Systems. Networks. Security. -- Robert Jordan: A Crown of Swords