[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
(usagi-users 01045) Re: [usagi-announce] 2001/11/26 snapshot
- To: usagi-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: (usagi-users 01045) Re: [usagi-announce] 2001/11/26 snapshot
- From: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2001 10:35:30 +0900
- In-reply-to: <200111261937.fAQJboD14535@possum.aciri.org>
- References: <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> <200111261937.fAQJboD14535@possum.aciri.org>
- Reply-to: usagi-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Sender: "Hideaki YOSHIFUJI" <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In article <200111261937.fAQJboD14535@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> (at Mon, 26 Nov 2001 11:37:50 -0800), Pavlin Radoslavov <pavlin@xxxxxxxxx> says:
> Approx. 1-2 months ago I asked about SO_REUSEPORT, but didn't get an
> answer, so here it is again:
>
> What is the reason for removing SO_REUSEPORT instead of keeping it there?
because it is linux, not bsd;
if we kept SO_REUSEPORT, we might had binary compatibility issue.
If you really want to use SO_REUSEPORT,
you can use it if you define it in the asm/socket.h
though this is undocumented.
--yoshfuji