[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

(usagi-users 01329) Re: does linux resolve ip6.int addresses?

To: usagi-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, mauro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: (usagi-users 01329) Re: does linux resolve ip6.int addresses?
From: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2002 03:03:44 +0900
Cc: project6@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, project6-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.33L2.0203221616070.1770-100000@trantor.ferrara.linux.it>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.33L2.0203221616070.1770-100000@trantor.ferrara.linux.it>
Reply-to: usagi-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: "Hideaki YOSHIFUJI" <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

In article <Pine.LNX.4.33L2.0203221616070.1770-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> (at Fri, 22 Mar 2002 16:18:59 +0100 (CET)), Mauro Tortonesi <mauro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> says:

> i have been told that linux only resolves ip6.arpa addresses. is this
> true? i am actually skimming glibc-2.2.4 code to find this out.

True; and it seems to use bit-label notation.
I think we should fix this problem...

-- 
Hideaki YOSHIFUJI @ USAGI Project <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
GPG FP: 9022 65EB 1ECF 3AD1 0BDF  80D8 4807 F894 E062 0EEA

Follow-Ups:
- (usagi-users 01332) Re: does linux resolve ip6.int addresses?
  - From: Pekka Savola

References:
- (usagi-users 01327) does linux resolve ip6.int addresses?
  - From: Mauro Tortonesi

Prev by Date: (usagi-users 01328) Re: does linux resolve ip6.int addresses?
Next by Date: (usagi-users 01330) Re: [project6] does linux resolve ip6.int addresses?
Previous by thread: (usagi-users 01328) Re: does linux resolve ip6.int addresses?
Next by thread: (usagi-users 01332) Re: does linux resolve ip6.int addresses?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread