[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
(usagi-users 01332) Re: does linux resolve ip6.int addresses?
- To: usagi-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: (usagi-users 01332) Re: does linux resolve ip6.int addresses?
- From: Pekka Savola <pekkas@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2002 14:26:11 +0200 (EET)
- Cc: mauro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, <project6@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <project6-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- In-reply-to: <20020323030344P.yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>
- Reply-to: usagi-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Sat, 23 Mar 2002, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / [iso-2022-jp] 吉藤英明 wrote:
> In article <Pine.LNX.4.33L2.0203221616070.1770-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> (at Fri, 22 Mar 2002 16:18:59 +0100 (CET)), Mauro Tortonesi <mauro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> says:
>
> > i have been told that linux only resolves ip6.arpa addresses. is this
> > true? i am actually skimming glibc-2.2.4 code to find this out.
>
> True; and it seems to use bit-label notation.
> I think we should fix this problem...
What do you mean by fixing?
glibc uses reverse nibbles in ip6.arpa, which is correct.
Whether ip6.arpa _and_ ip6.int should be tried as a transitionary
mechanism is another issue though.
--
Pekka Savola "Tell me of difficulties surmounted,
Netcore Oy not those you stumble over and fall"
Systems. Networks. Security. -- Robert Jordan: A Crown of Swords