(usagi-users 01333) Re: does linux resolve ip6.int addresses?

[YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

In article <Pine.LNX.4.44.0203231424440.27744-100000@xxxxxxxxxx> (at Sat, 23 Mar 2002 14:26:11 +0200 (EET)), Pekka Savola <pekkas@xxxxxxxxxx> says:

> > > i have been told that linux only resolves ip6.arpa addresses. is this
> > > true? i am actually skimming glibc-2.2.4 code to find this out.
> > 
> > True; and it seems to use bit-label notation.
> > I think we should fix this problem...
> 
> What do you mean by fixing?
> 
> glibc uses reverse nibbles in ip6.arpa, which is correct.
> 
> Whether ip6.arpa _and_ ip6.int should be tried as a transitionary
> mechanism is another issue though.

Hmm, let mee see the code; My system does not seem to work correctly...

-- 
Hideaki YOSHIFUJI @ USAGI Project <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
GPG FP: 9022 65EB 1ECF 3AD1 0BDF  80D8 4807 F894 E062 0EEA