[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
(usagi-users 01875) Re: IPv6 default route handling of tunneled packets
- To: usagi-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: (usagi-users 01875) Re: IPv6 default route handling of tunneled packets
- From: Fukumoto Atsushi <atsushi.fukumoto@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 07 Oct 2002 21:32:01 +0900
- In-reply-to: mk's message of "Mon, 07 Oct 2002 18:37:08 +0900." <m3zntq7fp7.wl@karaba.org>
- Reply-to: usagi-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Kanda-san wrote:
> IPv6-IPv6 tunnel code derived from HUT mipl.
>
Okay, there are two questions:
- whether it is proper to use ip6_route_input() in ipv6_ipv6_rcv()
- why the difference of ip6_route_input() and ip6_route_output()
The latter is not a matter of IPv6-IPv6 tunnel code, since the same
difference of ip6_route_input() and ip6_route_output() exists in older
Linux INET6 implementation code (2.2.19 at hand) with no MIP code. So
I guess it originates in the original Linux IPv6 code.
FUKUMOTO Atsushi
fukumoto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx