[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

(usagi-users 01962) Re: problem about ping6


--On Wednesday, November 13, 2002 11:10:04 AM -0700 David Stevens
<dlstevens@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> 
> The version of ping6 I have requires an interface address, not an
> interface name, for the "-I" argument.

Really? Are there different "ping6" floating around?

Cannot remember that -I needs other than an interface name:

Here on RHL 7.3:

# ping6 -I eth0 fe80::280:c8ff:fe**:****
PING fe80::280:c8ff:fe**:****(fe80::280:c8ff:fe**:****) from
fe80::2e0:18ff:fe9**:**** eth0: 56 data bytes
64 bytes from fe80::280:c8ff:fe**:****: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.201
ms

--- fe80::280:c8ff:fe**:**** ping statistics ---
1 packets transmitted, 1 received, 0% loss, time 0ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.201/0.201/0.201/0.000 ms

# ping6 -V
ping6 utility, iputils-ss020124

# rpm -qf `which ping6`
iputils-20020124-3
    
        Peter

---
Dr. Peter Bieringer
mailto: pb at bieringer dot de
http://www.bieringer.de/pb/
Key 0x958F422D : B501 24F4 9418 23E2 C0F3  F833 7B57 AA7B 958F 422D

Attachment: pgpmWLDcBvcUy.pgp
Description: PGP signature