[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
(usagi-users 02038) GRSecurity Interaction
- To: usagi-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: (usagi-users 02038) GRSecurity Interaction
- From: Elliott Mitchell <ehem@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 24 Dec 2002 20:07:42 -0800 (PST)
- Reply-to: usagi-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In addition to the USAGI patch I'm using the GRSecurity patch
(http://www.grsecurity.net/). There are a couple pieces that conflict,
most of them are trivial to resolve (they both need to add hooks in the
toplevel Makefile, both add headers to files, etc); however, in
net/ipv4/ip_output.c there is a more serious conflict.
In the function ip_build_xmit_slow(), the line
"id = sk->protinfo.af_inet.id++;" is moved a little over 100 lines
towards the begining of the file. Is this change really needed? Though I
could be mistaken this appears to be a superfluous change. Perhaps this
reflects the algorithm a little better, but it does make it trickier when
the two patches are used. If this really is needed perhaps this would be
a good candidate for getting moved into the mainstream kernel?
--
(\___(\___(\______ --=> 8-) EHM <=-- ______/)___/)___/)
\ ( | EHeM@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx PGP 8881EF59 | ) /
\_ \ | _____ -O #include <stddisclaimer.h> O- _____ | / _/
\___\_|_/82 04 A1 3C C7 B1 37 2A*E3 6E 84 DA 97 4C 40 E6\_|_/___/