[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
(usagi-users 02063) Re: getifaddrs() in glibc, IPv6 detection questions
- To: usagi-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: (usagi-users 02063) Re: getifaddrs() in glibc, IPv6 detection questions
- From: Pekka Savola <pekkas@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2003 09:10:30 +0200 (EET)
- In-reply-to: <000901c2b5d2$75359280$210d640a@unfix.org>
- Reply-to: usagi-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Mon, 6 Jan 2003, Jeroen Massar wrote:
> > > AI_ADDRCONFIG flag will help you when available.
> > > Otherwise, yes, scan addresses; or, try to socket(2).
> > > (In latter case, kernel may try to insmod ipv6.o)
> >
> > Then is it possible that an IPv6 interface would not be included by
> > getifaddrs() because the ipv6.o module hasn't been loaded?
> >
> > I'm wondering then if it's a more reliable IPv6 test to
> > attempt to bind to
> > 0::0 or to call socket(AF_INET6).
>
> Even then it doesn't say a thing wether the target is reachable
> or if it is even possible to get out of the local subnet.
>
> Just use getaddrinfo() that should take care of all your tests.
> If getaddrinfo() returns you AF_INET6 then there should also
> be support for IPv6 in the kernel.
Uhh, there are many ways to "use getaddrinfo()". Some of them return you
AF_INET6 addresses even though kernel does not have IPv6 enabled; that's
perfectly acceptable to me.
--
Pekka Savola "Tell me of difficulties surmounted,
Netcore Oy not those you stumble over and fall"
Systems. Networks. Security. -- Robert Jordan: A Crown of Swords