(usagi-users 02182) Re: Bug?: bind(6);bind(4);listen(6) used to work

[Lionel Elie Mamane <lionel@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 05:09:00PM +0900, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / ?$B5HF#1QL@ wrote:
> In article <20030205075634.GA5139@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> (at Wed, 5 Feb 2003 08:56:34 +0100), Lionel Elie Mamane <lionel@xxxxxxxxx> says:

>> I was commenting that having the listen
>> fail when both binds succeeded maybe wasn't a good idea. I think it
>> would be more coherent to have either:

>>  - bind(ipv6) = SUCCESS
>>  - bind(ipv4) = FAILURE

>> or

>>  - bind(ipv6) = SUCCESS
>>  - bind(ipv4) = SUCCESS
>>  - listen(ipv6) = SUCCESS
>>  - listen(ipv4) = FAILURE

> Would you test linux-2.4.21-preXX series?

I tested 2.4.21-pre4, it has the same behaviour as 2.4.20, namely:

  - bind(ipv6) = SUCCESS
  - bind(ipv4) = SUCCESS
  - listen(ipv6) = SUCCESS
  - listen(ipv4) = FAILURE

-- 
Lionel