[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
(usagi-users 02190) Re: IPSec over TCP
- To: <usagi-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: (usagi-users 02190) Re: IPSec over TCP
- From: "BUYCK Jacky FTRD/DMI/CAE" <jacky.buyck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2003 11:28:57 +0100
- Reply-to: usagi-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread-index: AcLRtDsl/r8R+enSQE2PFyGtB8bWlAABASQw
- Thread-topic: (usagi-users 02189) Re: IPSec over TCP
Really ?
Because there is solution that encapsulate IPSec packet in UDP and in TCP (the CISCO VPN 300 do the two kind of encapsulation).
-----Message d'origine-----
DeÂ: yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
EnvoyÃÂ: mardi 11 fÃvrier 2003 10:44
ÃÂ: usagi-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
ObjetÂ: (usagi-users 02189) Re: IPSec over TCP
In article <C691E039D3895C44AB8DFD006B950FB4013FC793@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> (at Tue, 11 Feb 2003 10:33:57 +0100), "BUYCK Jacky FTRD/DMI/CAE" <jacky.buyck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> says:
> net/ipv6/mobile_ip6/{mipv6.c,sendopts.c}: enabled to collaborate
> MIPv6 with IPsec over TCP.
I think this should be "TCP over IPsec."
--
Hideaki YOSHIFUJI @ USAGI Project <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
GPG FP: 9022 65EB 1ECF 3AD1 0BDF 80D8 4807 F894 E062 0EEA