[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
(usagi-users 02484) Re: ip6tables Feature Request
- To: usagi-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: (usagi-users 02484) Re: ip6tables Feature Request
- From: Pekka Savola <pekkas@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2003 06:33:22 +0300 (EEST)
- In-reply-to: <200307242323.h6ONNckX026177@m5p.com>
- Reply-to: usagi-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Thu, 24 Jul 2003, Elliott Mitchell wrote:
> The situations where it would be crucial don't appear to be common yet,
> but could a V6 target be created that passes a packet through the V4
> table?
>
> Specifically for the case where there are IPv6-only hosts, and therefore
> V4-mapped addresses directly on the wire it would be very useful to
> filter those packets through the V4 tables. There is plenty of
> documentation on how to generate new tests/targets, but much less on how
> to hack a packet to test versus the V4 rules.
IPv4-mapped addresses on the wire are completely bogus. DON'T DO THAT!
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-itojun-v6ops-v4mapped-harmful-01.txt
--
Pekka Savola "You each name yourselves king, yet the
Netcore Oy kingdom bleeds."
Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings