[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

(usagi-users 02506) Re: Limit on number of IP addresses

To: usagi-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, dwcraig@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: (usagi-users 02506) Re: Limit on number of IP addresses
From: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2003 04:08:29 +0900 (JST)
In-reply-to: <0320111483D8B84AAAB437215BBDA526011DD3@NAEX01.na.qualcomm.com>
Organization: USAGI Project
References: <0320111483D8B84AAAB437215BBDA526011DD3@NAEX01.na.qualcomm.com>
Reply-to: usagi-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: "Hideaki YOSHIFUJI" <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

In article <0320111483D8B84AAAB437215BBDA526011DD3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> (at Mon, 11 Aug 2003 13:21:43 -0700), "Craig, Dave" <dwcraig@xxxxxxxxxxxx> says:

> Just out of curiosity, why isn't there a limit on the number of IPv6
> addresses that may be configured?  This could be similar to the limit

There is a constant for it.  I would add sysctl interface for it.
Objections?

--yoshfuji

References:
- (usagi-users 02502) Limit on number of IP addresses
  - From: Craig, Dave

Prev by Date: (usagi-users 02505) Re: icmp6 err
Next by Date: (usagi-users 02507) TCP connect behavior during IKE negotiation
Previous by thread: (usagi-users 02502) Limit on number of IP addresses
Next by thread: (usagi-users 02504) icmp6 err
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread