[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
(usagi-users 02514) Re: (KAME-snap 7950) Re: IPsec & tunnel problem
- To: snap-users@xxxxxxxx
- Subject: (usagi-users 02514) Re: (KAME-snap 7950) Re: IPsec & tunnel problem
- From: Ralf Spenneberg <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 19 Aug 2003 18:21:22 +0200
- Cc: usagi-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <00be01c3666a$bef9e300$227ae792@ict.ru.ac.za>
- References: <3F423BE3.6020601@logix.cz> <1061307523.1628.14.camel@kermit> <00be01c3666a$bef9e300$227ae792@ict.ru.ac.za>
- Reply-to: usagi-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Resent-date: Wed, 20 Aug 2003 15:29:45 +0900
- Resent-from: sekiya@xxxxxxxxxx
- Resent-message-id: <200308201529.FMLAAB27654.usagi-users@linux-ipv6.org>
- Resent-to: usagi-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx (moderated)
Am Die, 2003-08-19 um 17.58 schrieb Barry Irwin:
> Michal,
>
> what you may find very useful in the absence of another test system behind
> your gateways is to use the -S (on FreeBSD, should be the same on *BSD, and
> Linux may use the -s version iirc) flag to ping, which allows you to
> specify the source address. I've seen a similar issue to what you are
> describing, and concur with Ralf that routing is involved.
Great idea I have not thought of!
Very good for testing the connection without the routing table hassle.
On Linux you use the -I switch to set the source address to the
specified interface.
Cheers,
Ralf
--
Ralf Spenneberg
RHCE, RHCX
Book: Intrusion Detection für Linux Server http://www.spenneberg.com
IPsec-Howto http://www.ipsec-howto.org
Honeynet Project Mirror: http://honeynet.spenneberg.org