[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
(usagi-users 02525) sit tunnel/iptunnel bug?
- To: <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <usagi-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: (usagi-users 02525) sit tunnel/iptunnel bug?
- From: "Zoltan NAGY" <nagyz@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 7 Sep 2003 01:28:08 +0200
- Importance: Normal
- Reply-to: usagi-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Resent-date: Sun, 7 Sep 2003 11:14:17 +0900
- Resent-from: sekiya@xxxxxxxxxx
- Resent-message-id: <200309071114.FMLAAB8106.usagi-users@linux-ipv6.org>
- Resent-to: usagi-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx (moderated)
hi!
i've got some really odd behavior.. if i do:
ip tunnel add t12 mode sit remote 195.70.51.141 local 195.70.37.175 ttl 64
then ip link set t12 up i got:
RTNETLINK answers: No such device
it must be a bug, because i only get this if i have another 12 or more
tunnels added before this one.. and just with specific ip address, if i
change it or simply use ip tunnel add t12 mode sit remote 195.70.51.141,
then it's working..
this problem exists in 2.4.20, and .22; .21 is not tested..
is this a real bug? has anyone experienced it before?
thanks,
--
Zoltan NAGY,
Network Administrator,
Nefty Informatics and Providing Ltd.,
nagyz@xxxxxxxx,
+36702269471