[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

(usagi-users 03076) Re: [Patch] Port nf_conntrack_ftp to use moduleparam macros

To: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / åèèæ <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: (usagi-users 03076) Re: [Patch] Port nf_conntrack_ftp to use moduleparam macros
From: Michal Rokos <michal@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2004 15:43:28 +0200
Cc: usagi-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20041015.223509.22656994.yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>
References: <200410142245.40267.michal@rokos.info> <20041015.223509.22656994.yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>
Reply-to: usagi-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: KMail/1.7

Hello, 
On Friday 15 of October 2004 15:35, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / åèèæ wrote:

> In article <200410142245.40267.michal@xxxxxxxxxx> (at Thu, 14 Oct 2004 
22:45:40 +0200), Michal Rokos <michal@xxxxxxxxxx> says:
> > PS: Is it OK to send those patches here?
>
> Yes.  But please do not do cosmetic changes next time.  Thank you.

Cosmetic changes? Like what?

moduleparam API?
or "for(i" -> "for (i"?
or correcting comments?

Michal

Follow-Ups:
- (usagi-users 03079) Re: [Patch] Port nf_conntrack_ftp to use moduleparam macros
  - From: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明
- (usagi-users 03077) Re: [Patch] Port nf_conntrack_ftp to use moduleparam macros
  - From: Yasuyuki Kozakai

References:
- (usagi-users 03069) [Patch] Port nf_conntrack_ftp to use moduleparam macros
  - From: Michal Rokos
- (usagi-users 03075) Re: [Patch] Port nf_conntrack_ftp to use moduleparam macros
  - From: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明

Prev by Date: (usagi-users 03075) Re: [Patch] Port nf_conntrack_ftp to use moduleparam macros
Next by Date: (usagi-users 03077) Re: [Patch] Port nf_conntrack_ftp to use moduleparam macros
Previous by thread: (usagi-users 03075) Re: [Patch] Port nf_conntrack_ftp to use moduleparam macros
Next by thread: (usagi-users 03077) Re: [Patch] Port nf_conntrack_ftp to use moduleparam macros
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread