[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

(usagi-users 03079) Re: [Patch] Port nf_conntrack_ftp to use moduleparam macros

To: michal@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: (usagi-users 03079) Re: [Patch] Port nf_conntrack_ftp to use moduleparam macros
From: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 16 Oct 2004 05:46:50 +0900 (JST)
Cc: usagi-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <200410151543.28234.michal@rokos.info>
Organization: USAGI Project
References: <200410142245.40267.michal@rokos.info> <20041015.223509.22656994.yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> <200410151543.28234.michal@rokos.info>
Reply-to: usagi-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

In article <200410151543.28234.michal@xxxxxxxxxx> (at Fri, 15 Oct 2004 15:43:28 +0200), Michal Rokos <michal@xxxxxxxxxx> says:

> On Friday 15 of October 2004 15:35, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 wrote:
:
> > Yes.  But please do not do cosmetic changes next time.  Thank you.
> 
> Cosmetic changes? Like what?
> 
> moduleparam API?
> or "for(i" -> "for (i"?
> or correcting comments?

Each itself is okay, but for easier review, 
please do not combine;  send respectively.
Thanks.

--yoshfuji

Follow-Ups:
- (usagi-users 03080) Re: [Patch] Port nf_conntrack_ftp to use moduleparam macros
  - From: Michal Rokos

References:
- (usagi-users 03069) [Patch] Port nf_conntrack_ftp to use moduleparam macros
  - From: Michal Rokos
- (usagi-users 03075) Re: [Patch] Port nf_conntrack_ftp to use moduleparam macros
  - From: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明
- (usagi-users 03076) Re: [Patch] Port nf_conntrack_ftp to use moduleparam macros
  - From: Michal Rokos

Prev by Date: (usagi-users 03078) Re: IPv6 capable telnet
Next by Date: (usagi-users 03080) Re: [Patch] Port nf_conntrack_ftp to use moduleparam macros
Previous by thread: (usagi-users 03077) Re: [Patch] Port nf_conntrack_ftp to use moduleparam macros
Next by thread: (usagi-users 03080) Re: [Patch] Port nf_conntrack_ftp to use moduleparam macros
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread