[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

(usagi-users 03080) Re: [Patch] Port nf_conntrack_ftp to use moduleparam macros

To: usagi-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: (usagi-users 03080) Re: [Patch] Port nf_conntrack_ftp to use moduleparam macros
From: Michal Rokos <michal@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 16 Oct 2004 00:00:59 +0200
In-reply-to: <20041016.054650.66358523.yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>
References: <200410142245.40267.michal@rokos.info> <200410151543.28234.michal@rokos.info> <20041016.054650.66358523.yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>
Reply-to: usagi-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: KMail/1.7

Hello,

On Friday 15 of October 2004 22:46, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 wrote:
> In article <200410151543.28234.michal@xxxxxxxxxx> (at Fri, 15 Oct 2004 
15:43:28 +0200), Michal Rokos <michal@xxxxxxxxxx> says:
> > On Friday 15 of October 2004 15:35, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 wrote:
> > > Yes.  But please do not do cosmetic changes next time.  Thank
> > > you.
> >
> > Cosmetic changes? Like what?
> >
> > moduleparam API?
> > or "for(i" -> "for (i"?
> > or correcting comments?
>
> Each itself is okay, but for easier review,
> please do not combine;  send respectively.

OK. Sorry for that. I'll send them as separate next time.

 Michal

PS: I'm on the list now.

References:
- (usagi-users 03069) [Patch] Port nf_conntrack_ftp to use moduleparam macros
  - From: Michal Rokos
- (usagi-users 03076) Re: [Patch] Port nf_conntrack_ftp to use moduleparam macros
  - From: Michal Rokos
- (usagi-users 03079) Re: [Patch] Port nf_conntrack_ftp to use moduleparam macros
  - From: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明

Prev by Date: (usagi-users 03079) Re: [Patch] Port nf_conntrack_ftp to use moduleparam macros
Next by Date: (usagi-users 03081) radvd problem: routes aren't deleted
Previous by thread: (usagi-users 03079) Re: [Patch] Port nf_conntrack_ftp to use moduleparam macros
Next by thread: (usagi-users 03073) IPv6 capable telnet
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread