Getting back to an ooooold thread... On Wed, Sep 22, 2004 at 12:06:30PM +0900, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / ?$B5HF#1QL@ wrote: > In article <20040921195752.015e3d1d.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> (at Tue, 21 Sep 2004 19:57:52 -0700), "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> says: > > > On Mon, 20 Sep 2004 15:20:12 +0900 (JST) > > YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > This behavior lives for years (AFAIK), > > > and we haven't got so many reports > > > because people usually bring loopback device first. > > > > > > I think the following message will help people, anyway. > > > > If ipv6 has a dependency upon this, why doesn't it just > > bring the device up itself at this moment if necessary? > > Okay, I'll make a patch for this. As far as I can see (please correct me) no such patch was included so far, at least with 2.6.10-rc3 I still have the old behaviour. Could you please include the proposed printk-warning-patch until the issue gets resolved? Thanks! -- - Harald Welte <laforge@xxxxxxxxxxxx> http://www.gnumonks.org/ ============================================================================ Programming is like sex: One mistake and you have to support it your lifetime
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature