[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
(usagi-users 03503) Re: Transparent IPv6 Multicast routing
- To: usagi-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: (usagi-users 03503) Re: Transparent IPv6 Multicast routing
- From: Valdis.Kletnieks@xxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2005 02:02:03 -0400
- In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 28 Sep 2005 22:45:09 BST." <20050928214509.34852.qmail@web26402.mail.ukl.yahoo.com>
- References: <20050928214509.34852.qmail@web26402.mail.ukl.yahoo.com>
- Reply-to: usagi-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Resent-date: Thu, 29 Sep 2005 18:38:50 +0900
- Resent-from: sekiya@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Resent-message-id: <200509291838.FMLAAB28480.usagi-users@linux-ipv6.org>
- Resent-to: usagi-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx (moderated)
On Wed, 28 Sep 2005 22:45:09 BST, Peter said:
> I have an IPv6 routing problem, which perhaps USAGI
> can help me solve?
>
>
> I want to set up a linux 2.4 box to forward *all* ipv6
> traffic coming in from eth1, actually arbitrary
> scoped IPv6 multicast addressed streams, to
> interface ppp0.
*all*? Including traffic for its own IPv6 address, packets whos TTL has
expired, multicast packets that would go out-of-scope, and any other
things that the RFCs say shouldn't be forwarded?
Attachment:
pgpVoIytpx94b.pgp
Description: PGP signature