[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

(usagi-users 03967) Re: diiferences between "ip command" and "route command"

It is that. Thank you Romain.
I was wonder why I cannot ping  my home address from my mobile node. Even
in the Home Network there is a route associated to the tunnel. Is this an
expected behaviour?

> Hi Eraldo,
> On 2007/10/09, at 18:23, Eraldo Silveira e Silva wrote:
>> while "ip -6 route show" displays:
>> default via fe80::10e9:b9ff:feb6:f549 dev eth0
> As you may know, Linux maintains several routing tables identified by
> a number from 1 to 255. The "ip -6 route show" command will only show
> the "main" table (i.e. #254). To see all of the tables, you should do
> "ip -6 route show table all": you'll then see the route towards the
> tunnel (which is stored in table #252).
> My guess is that by default the "route" command displays all of the
> tables, that's why you could see a difference.
> Cheers,
> --
> Romain KUNTZ
> kuntz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Louis Pasteur University - Networks and Protocols Team