[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

(usagi-users 03969) Re: diiferences between "ip command" and "route command"

Hi Romain,
I forgot to activate loopback interface and this is the reason of the ping
failure in the HoA of MN (mobile node). MIP works and MN can ping its HoA.

Considering that the IP of MN is  2000:a::1, the main table has a route:

2000:a::1 dev ip6tnl1

while the local table has:

local 2000:a::1 via :: dev lo

I suppose the kernel uses the local table, as stated by "ip -6 rule list"
to solve the route:

0:      from all lookup 255
1001:   from 2000:a::1 lookup 252
1002:   from fe80::/64 lookup main
1002:   from 2000:a::/64 lookup main
32766:  from all lookup main


> Hi Eraldo,
> On 2007/10/10, at 12:24, Eraldo Silveira e Silva wrote:
>> It is that. Thank you Romain.
>> I was wonder why I cannot ping  my home address from my mobile node.
> Do you mean that from the Mobile Node, you try to ping your own HoA?
>> Even in the Home Network there is a route associated to the tunnel.
>> Is this an
>> expected behaviour?
> If I remember well, the route for the HoA towards the tunnel should
> be deleted when the Binding Update List entry is deleted (e.g. when
> in the home network).
> Can you give more information about your network topology, your
> configuration files, if you use IPsec or not, the case when it does
> not work, and the log files of mip6d on the MN and HA?