[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
(usagi-users 04015) Re: mipv6-daemon: tiny diff
- To: usagi-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: (usagi-users 04015) Re: mipv6-daemon: tiny diff
- From: Masahide NAKAMURA <nakam@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 10:21:30 +0900
- Cc: Max Laier <max@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- In-reply-to: <200801120258.24327.max@love2party.net>
- References: <200801120258.24327.max@love2party.net>
- Reply-to: usagi-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Resent-date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 11:03:42 +0900
- Resent-from: nakam@xxxxxxxxxxxx
- Resent-message-id: <200801151103.FMLAAB17499.usagi-users@linux-ipv6.org>
- Resent-to: usagi-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx (moderated)
- User-agent: KMail/1.9.1
Saturday 12 January 2008 10:58, Max Laier wrote:
> just came across the attached while reading the MIPv6-daemon code.
> Without this diff it seems that memset will stomp over the freshly
> initialized tmp->lock. Looks like this slipped through as the lock calls
> are not checked for error returns.
Applied, thanks.
--
Masahide NAKAMURA