[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
(usagi-users 04034) IPv6_NEXTHOP socket option
- To: usagi-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: (usagi-users 04034) IPv6_NEXTHOP socket option
- From: "Vishwas Manral" <vishwas.ietf@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2008 15:28:19 -0700
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=q1HoQdOMM9oJOaDPDu5islBYYYdXkSt4dVPAmr/y5ds=; b=TteIB87E6uBt5m4cuG7KdF6XEBgIjHr2mtQVg2wrcB63+VCOS4Ly9wdk2mtQoBmQeQYQArby+TJEKBT2hkxsmofA0dkjHFTNzDU14qAu/dzI1HvABBDrhwW3EWeNNdy4jV835EH10+b9BlTClx3bIkBabXPBbMQAwjCZwIZUjoI=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=IcKRUhTDL+1OZse+YkvTFAIUfsfz2CgRWOvJlwUpsM8HJ9hU50t4cX8v6cU47by4+IVrxdreEuIVWnq/NJGXNMbOl+RUKrxWN5r9nTW1a4BASYbZXhndIOkp8T0zJKBJwwwqxLrSfWzuYR4b1TNyKJVjCKT3cNq+hi3d5naPUI8=
- In-reply-to: <77ead0ec0803211457k3ed2ad19w7ac6791cabc3ab90@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <77ead0ec0803211457k3ed2ad19w7ac6791cabc3ab90@mail.gmail.com>
- Reply-to: usagi-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Hi folks,
I am trying to work on RSVP-TE for IPv6. For that we require to send
an IPv6 packet from a source to a destination using the Nexthop given
in the content of the Path message.
I am using AF_INET6 family socket. I tried t use the mechanism of
cmsghdr/ msghdr ancillary data. I tried on both 2.4 and 2.6 standard
Linux kernels and I got the Unknown argument error. On looking at
the code for it in the kernel I found that the code for handling
IPV6_NEXTHOP is missing in the Linux Kernel.
A similar exercise using setsockopt with the same option gave similar
results. ipv6_sockglue.c in function do_ipv6_setsockopt does not have the code
to handle the IPV6_NEXTHOP option. Is there another way I can achieve
the same functionality?
Thanks,
Vishwas
PS: I posted the same issue in the Kernelnewbies and was directed to this group